Prediction of limit strains during non-proportional load paths with a change in loading direction

Wolfram Volk
01.09.2021
100020110

Abstract

Many different models have been published to predict failure after non-proportional load paths. Most of those models are phenomenological and heuristical models. They require a profound knowledge about the material. Examples are the enhanced Modified Maximum Force Criterion (eMMFC), the Polar Effective Plastic Strain-model (PEPS) or the Generalized Forming Limit Concept (GFLC). In addition to the load path, the loading direction has a significant influence on the formability of sheet metals. The mentioned models currently neglect this influence. By extending the GFLC-model by the parameter of loading direction, this influence is taken into account. By analyzing an acceptable number of bi-linear experiments, it is possible to calibrate the proposed model for a micro-alloyed steel HC340LA. Therewith an arbitrary load path with a change in loading direction can be evaluated. The results of this contribution show the effectiveness of this approach by different experiments


  • Video comes from: W. Volk et al, Prediction of limit strains during non-proportional load paths with a change in loading direction 2020 IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 967 012069
  • Graf A. and Hosford W. 1993 Effect of changing strain paths on Forming Limit Diagrams of Al 2008-T4. Metallurgical Transactions A 24:671
  • Bergström Y. and Ölund S. 1982 The forming limit diagram of sheet metals and effects of strain path changes on formability: a dislocation treatment. Materials Science and Engineering 56:47–61
  • Stoughton T.B. and Yoon J.W. 2012 Path independent forming limits in strain and stress spaces. International Journal of Solids and Structures 49:3616–3625
  • Hora, P.,Tong, L., Reissner, J. 1994 Prediction Methods for Ductile Sheet Metal Failure using FE-Simulation. 18th IDDRG Congress, Lisbon
  • Hora P 2008 Theoretical prediction of the influence of curvature and thickness on the FLC by the enhanced modified maximum force criterion (Interlaken)
  • Volk W., Groche P., Brosius A., Ghiotti A., Kinsey B.L., Liewald M., Madej L., Min J. and Yanagimoto J. 2019 Models and modelling for process limits in metal forming. CIRP Annals 68:775–798
  • Volk W., Hoffmann H., Suh J. and Kim J. 2012 Failure prediction for nonlinear strain paths in sheet metal forming. CIRP Annals 61:259–262
  • Volk W. and Suh J. 2013 Prediction of formability for non-linear deformation history using generalized forming limit concept (GFLC). AIP Conference Proceedings 1567:556–561
  • Weinschenk A. and Volk W. 2017 FEA-based development of a new tool for systematic experimental validation of nonlinear strain paths and design of test specimens. AIP Conference Proceedings 1896
  • Volk W. and Hora P. 2011 New algorithm for a robust user-independent evaluation of beginning instability for the experimental FLC determination. Int J Mater Form 4:339–346
  • Eder M., Gruber M. and Volk W. 2019 Innovative Tool for Material Model Assessment and Improvement. Proceedings of the Forming Technology Forum 2019
  • Volk W. and Gaber C. 2017 Investigation and Compensation of Biaxial Pre-strain During the Standard Nakajima- and Marciniak-test Using Generalized Forming Limit Concept. Procedia Engineering 207:568–573

Contents

  • Greetings
  • Introduction and motivation
  • Experimental setup
  • Pre-forming results
  • Non-proportional load paths
  • 3D - GFLC model
  • Summary and conclusion
Topics

Non-proportional load paths
Forming limit curve
3D/GFLC model
Comments of reviewers


Research Vision

Copyright © Mingxuan Lin 2022.